Hello
Declaration of Human Rights Watch official site in the following readingIran: Free human rights activist; fair trial guarantees canShiva starchy court opinion that will be held soon to serious crimesIs accused(New York, September 1, 2010) - Human Rights Watch said today that Iran's judiciary has the dutyMr. Adel starchy comment for Shiva, human rights activist, to form that includes full access to lawyers, thenSuitable for preparing the defense, as well as questioning the ability of the evidence against him is presented. JudiciaryJudiciary must also have his temporary detention in violation of international law and Iran is to end.Twentieth day of December 2009, security forces and two starchy eloquent comments of his colleagues, and Kvhyar GoudarziS. Haeri the Reporters Committee for human rights activists were arrested. The three were arrested whileWho had intended to go by bus to the city of Qom to the funeral of Ayatollah Montazeri, dissident cleric,Participate. Tehran prosecutor Shiva starchy comment to complicity in the crime (Article 610 of the Penal Code)Propaganda against the state (Article 500), and War - a charge that no clear definition and meaning of the overall war on God(Article 183186 and 91-190) has accused. War may lead to charges of death, and usuallyPersons alleged to be a member of organizations that are engaged in armed struggle against the government.Joe Stork, deputy Middle East director at Human Rights Watch said: "target starchy and eloquent commentsMany human rights activists as evidence that a strong sign of deteriorating human rights situation in Iran. ""Shiva comment starchy facing very serious charges and minimum action that the government should do thisThe court just for him to form. "
Mr. Sharif, who along with her luminous brain representing Shiva opinion has taken the starchy WatchHe told Human Rights On May 23, nearly two weeks before the first and only court ever considered for ShivaIs made up of starchy, finally allowed to study his client received the file. Mr. Sharif said thatWar on charges related to the apparent relationship with Shiva comment starchy Party has exiled MKO.Government officials often human rights activists and opposition members such as the Reporters Committee for Human Rights accusedTo communicate with the Mojahedin. The charge usually will result in sentencing War, although the government rarelyThis species is able to really prove unrealistic allegations and show that the relationship between these organizationsMEK has existed.Shiva starchy comment has denied the charge, and Mr. Sharif, told Human Rights Watch thatShiva file absolutely no evidence of contact with the MKO Shiva there and he never fightArmed government has not paid. Sharif also said that other charges related to national security thatShiva starchy comment has been entered because his human rights work in the Reporters Committee for Human RightsBe.A member of the Reporters Committee for Human Rights Human Rights Watch said that during the first court opinionJudge starchy old Abbasid Revolution Court Branch 26 cases starchy Shiva comment referred to the Prosecutor's Office andThey wanted to claim her relationship with the MEK to make clear. He also placed next to the courtDay set Sept. 4, 2010. Earlier this year a member of this group Human Rights Watch said thatShiva and his colleagues considered starchy pressured by interrogators were to communicate with MKOPeople have confessed. He also cited that after Shiva's comment to the starchy state media advertising campaignStarchy and colleagues discussed and considered him to communicate with the MKO accused.The authorities now consider Shiva starchy women in the general ward of Evin prison, said. Prison authoritiesRecent months, families who have permission to comment starchy short meetings with Shiva have. A rights activistHuman family is close to the organization Human Rights Watch said: "health status of womenVery bad.He added: "No hot water at all due to lice and prisoners with their heads to washing powderWash.May 23, after the first trial that other authority, Mr. Sharif did not let up with starchy commentMeet.Mr Sharif said: "Unlike the others when the lawyer can go to jail and to accept the law andMeet with their client, we meet with political prisoners need to have permission from the judiciary. UnfortunatelyThis permission is not given to me. "Mr. Sharif also Human Rights Watch said Iranian law should arrest his client every two monthsReview and extension, and the judiciary should give the defendant permission to any decision that causes moreIs to protest his detention.Goodarzi Kvhyar that starchy, was arrested along with comments in June 2010 by Branch 26 of Revolutionary Court charges"Propaganda against the system" and other crimes related to national security one year in prison was sentenced. HeAnd 16 other prisoners in July for protesting the prison guards with abuse and hunger strike by the authoritiesWere transferred to solitary confinement in prison. S. Haeri who was arrested along with starchy comment in March 2010Was released.Iran is among countries that the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights has signed. Article 9 of thisAlliance said: "Everyone charged with any crime that has been arrested or detained should be without the presence of layJudge or other officer who has judicial authority by law be brought to the court for his timeReasonable issued or to be free. " This article also states that "a person in public lawExpect the court remained in prison should not be confined, although perhaps subject to export freedom to provideAttend trial be. Detainees "should have the right to be present in the great courtWithout delay, the court decides that imprisonment has legal or otherwise release them. "Article 14 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights requires that authorities arrested "time andAppropriate facilities to allow for self-defense are ready and able to choose a lawyer that they communicate andConsultation should "and" lay be tried without. "Stork expressed: "The Iranian government's extended term of imprisonment in conditions considered unsuitable and starchy before his trial,Into serious and vague charges, and depriving his lawyer violated the fundamental rights of starchy commentHas. " "The only action is to just release him and allow him to meet with your lawyer and
Mr. Sharif, who along with her luminous brain representing Shiva opinion has taken the starchy WatchHe told Human Rights On May 23, nearly two weeks before the first and only court ever considered for ShivaIs made up of starchy, finally allowed to study his client received the file. Mr. Sharif said thatWar on charges related to the apparent relationship with Shiva comment starchy Party has exiled MKO.Government officials often human rights activists and opposition members such as the Reporters Committee for Human Rights accusedTo communicate with the Mojahedin. The charge usually will result in sentencing War, although the government rarelyThis species is able to really prove unrealistic allegations and show that the relationship between these organizationsMEK has existed.Shiva starchy comment has denied the charge, and Mr. Sharif, told Human Rights Watch thatShiva file absolutely no evidence of contact with the MKO Shiva there and he never fightArmed government has not paid. Sharif also said that other charges related to national security thatShiva starchy comment has been entered because his human rights work in the Reporters Committee for Human RightsBe.A member of the Reporters Committee for Human Rights Human Rights Watch said that during the first court opinionJudge starchy old Abbasid Revolution Court Branch 26 cases starchy Shiva comment referred to the Prosecutor's Office andThey wanted to claim her relationship with the MEK to make clear. He also placed next to the courtDay set Sept. 4, 2010. Earlier this year a member of this group Human Rights Watch said thatShiva and his colleagues considered starchy pressured by interrogators were to communicate with MKOPeople have confessed. He also cited that after Shiva's comment to the starchy state media advertising campaignStarchy and colleagues discussed and considered him to communicate with the MKO accused.The authorities now consider Shiva starchy women in the general ward of Evin prison, said. Prison authoritiesRecent months, families who have permission to comment starchy short meetings with Shiva have. A rights activistHuman family is close to the organization Human Rights Watch said: "health status of womenVery bad.He added: "No hot water at all due to lice and prisoners with their heads to washing powderWash.May 23, after the first trial that other authority, Mr. Sharif did not let up with starchy commentMeet.Mr Sharif said: "Unlike the others when the lawyer can go to jail and to accept the law andMeet with their client, we meet with political prisoners need to have permission from the judiciary. UnfortunatelyThis permission is not given to me. "Mr. Sharif also Human Rights Watch said Iranian law should arrest his client every two monthsReview and extension, and the judiciary should give the defendant permission to any decision that causes moreIs to protest his detention.Goodarzi Kvhyar that starchy, was arrested along with comments in June 2010 by Branch 26 of Revolutionary Court charges"Propaganda against the system" and other crimes related to national security one year in prison was sentenced. HeAnd 16 other prisoners in July for protesting the prison guards with abuse and hunger strike by the authoritiesWere transferred to solitary confinement in prison. S. Haeri who was arrested along with starchy comment in March 2010Was released.Iran is among countries that the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights has signed. Article 9 of thisAlliance said: "Everyone charged with any crime that has been arrested or detained should be without the presence of layJudge or other officer who has judicial authority by law be brought to the court for his timeReasonable issued or to be free. " This article also states that "a person in public lawExpect the court remained in prison should not be confined, although perhaps subject to export freedom to provideAttend trial be. Detainees "should have the right to be present in the great courtWithout delay, the court decides that imprisonment has legal or otherwise release them. "Article 14 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights requires that authorities arrested "time andAppropriate facilities to allow for self-defense are ready and able to choose a lawyer that they communicate andConsultation should "and" lay be tried without. "Stork expressed: "The Iranian government's extended term of imprisonment in conditions considered unsuitable and starchy before his trial,Into serious and vague charges, and depriving his lawyer violated the fundamental rights of starchy commentHas. " "The only action is to just release him and allow him to meet with your lawyer and
Source :
